Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition due to a subsequent order in Shamim Ahmed, which was granted.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
134
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 3347 of 2021
Date of Decision: 09.09.2021
Aadil Khan and Another
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Khalid, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Tarun Walia, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.1 to 3.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
The learned counsel representing the petitioners prays for permission to withdraw the petition in view of the order passed in Shamim Ahmed v. State of Haryana and Others (Civil Writ Petition No. 7478 of
2021, dated 26.07.2021 ).
Ordered accordingly.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge
September 09, 2021 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2021.09.10 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shamim Ahmed v. State of Haryana and Others (Civil Writ Petition No. 7478 of 2021, dated 26.07.2021)Referred¶14
Aadil Khan and Another
State of Haryana and Others
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
