Allowed

Navjot Singh @ Gopi v. State of Punjab and Other

Punjab & Haryana HC9 Sept 2021CRM-M/2038/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a second petition for pre-arrest bail filed by the petitioner in a criminal case. The court accepted a settlement and a police report indicating the petitioner had joined the investigation and was not needed for further interrogation, making the earlier order absolute.

What did the court decide?

The petition for pre-arrest bail is allowed and the order dated 18.02.2020 is made absolute.

Navjot Singh @ Gopi Vs State of Punjab and Other — Cheating and Forgery | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

201

¶3

NAVJOT SINGH @ GOPI

¶4

CRM-M-2038-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.09.2021 ..Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

¶7

..Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

¶9

Present: Mr. PKS Phoolka, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hittan Nehra, Addl. AG, Punjab.

¶10

¶11

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J (Oral)

¶12

On 18.02.2020, the following order was passed:-

¶13

“Prayer in this petition is for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in a case arising out from FIR NO.07 dated 15.01.2019, registered under Sections 452/341/323/427/34 IPC (Section 325 IPC added later on vide DDR NO.32, dated 13.09.2019), at Police Station Sadar Kotkapura, District Faridkot. This is second petition filed for grant of same relief.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon a panchayati compromise dated 28.01.2019, Annexure P-3.

¶15

Mr. Tejwinder Singh Hundal, Advocate, appearing on behalf of respondents no.2 and 3 admits the aforesaid compromise/settlement.

¶16

Report by way of affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Kotkapura, District Faridkot, has been filed in Court today, which is taken on record.

¶17

Keeping in view the facts of the case, petitioner is directed to join the investigation. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶18

Adjourned to 16.03.2020.”

¶19

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Sukhwinder

¶20

Singh, has informed the Court that the petitioner has joined the investigation,

¶21

ASHOK KUMAR 2021.09.09 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and and has cooperated and is not required for further custodial interrogation. integrity of this document

¶22

CRM-M-2038-2020 (O&M)

¶23

¶24

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is

¶25

allowed and the order dated 18.02.2020 is made absolute.

¶26

All the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, are also

¶27

disposed of.

¶28

09.09.2021 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) ashok JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶29

ASHOK KUMAR 2021.09.09 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Navjot Singh @ Gopi v. State of Punjab and Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Navjot Singh @ Gopi v. State of Punjab and Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kailasho Devi and Anr. Vs Satish Kumar and Ors.

Banwari Lal Vs Satish Kumar and Ors.

Khushi Ram @ Rajesh Vs Mahabir

Sangeeta Vs Yogesh Kumar @ Kamal

Aadil Khan and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Charu Mahajan Vs Sumit Mahajan