Disposed

Anand Rawal v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC20 Dec 2021CWP/25967/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of a writ petition by directing the competent authority to determine the petitioner's pending salary grievance within six weeks, considering his earlier representation and arguments raised in the petition without commenting on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the competent authority to look into the grievance of the petitioner as per representation dated 03.08.2021 and take a decision within six weeks.

Anand Rawal Vs State of Haryana and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

Sr. No.133

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CWP-25967-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.12.2021

¶4

Anand Rawal …Petitioner

¶5

Vs. State of Haryana and others …Respondents

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

¶7

Present : Dr.Vikas Rohal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶8

Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.

¶9

¶10

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)

¶11

Petitioner, herein , inter alia , seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release his pending salary, as the same has not been paid by the respondents.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was appointed to the post of Naib Tehsildar, on 13.08.2008. He was transferred to various locations. Petitioner being transferred to various stations, the salary of the petitioner is pending. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that qua his aforesaid grievance, petitioner submitted a representation dated 03.08.2021 (AnnexureP-17) but to no avail. Hence, the instant petition.

¶13

Notice of motion.

¶14

On advance service, learned State counsel joins proceedings

¶15

and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State of Haryana and seeks time to file reply.

¶16

VANDANA 2021.12.21 21:49 I attest to the accuracy of this order

¶17

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that let a final decision be taken, by the competent authority on the pending representation dated 03.08.2021 (Annexure P-17).

¶18

Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity toseek return by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/orpleadings are required.

¶19

Without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to look into the grievance of the petitioner as per representation dated 03.08.2021 (Annexure P-17) and also by keeping in view the contentions raised in the present petition by treating the same as supplementary representation and take a decision, in accordance with law.

¶20

Let the needful be done within a period of 06 weeks from today since the petitioner has not been paid salary.

¶21

Disposed of accordingly.

¶22

20.12.2021 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE

¶23

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶24

VANDANA 2021.12.21 21:49 I attest to the accuracy of this order

Anand Rawal v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Rawal v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Randhir Singh Vs Balbir Singh

Veena Rani Vs State of Haryana and Others

Ram Saran and Anr. Vs Gram Panchayayt Jatthlana

Bir Singh Vs State of Haryana

Rajender Vs State of Haryana and Others