Single judge disposed of a writ petition regarding classification of disability category for employment. Directing authority to treat the petition as a representation and decide within 30 days, referring to prior precedent.
Direction to competent authority to treat writ petition as representation and decide within 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-24357-2021 Date of Decision: 01.12.2021
Vikram Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : Mr. Surinder Gaur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Petition herein, inter alia , is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner in dependent of Disabled ESM General Category as he inadvertently applied in the category of dependent of ESM General Category.
the issuance of notice of motion.
VANDANA 2021.12.02 22:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
01.12. 2021 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
VANDANA 2021.12.02 22:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be treated as a representation for final decision by the competent authority.
Whether the petitioner's inadvertent application to the wrong category warrants reconsideration of candidature.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Usha Dhillon Vs. State of Haryana and othersReferred¶14
Usha Dhillon Vs. State of Haryana and others, 2015(2) PLR 412
Vikram Singh
State of Haryana
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
