Disposed

Anoop Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC26 Nov 2021CWP/24050/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged the replacement by new contractual employees via a letter dated 05.10.2021, alleging violation of specific administrative instructions. The Single Judge recorded an advanced service of the State counsel and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Panchkula to look into the grievance, comply with instructions in the petition and representation, give reasons, and report on action against erring

Anoop Singh and Others Vs State of Haryana… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CWP-24050-2021 Date of Decision: 26.11.2021

¶3

Anoop Singh and others

¶4

...Petitioners

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Haryana and others

¶7

…Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

¶9

Present : Mr. Pardeep Kumar Sehrawat, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶10

Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional A.G., Haryana.

¶11

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)

¶12

Petition herein inter alia is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari seeking to quash letter dated 05.10.2021(Annexure P-5),vide which, allegedly, new set of contractual employees have replaced the petitioners. It is claimed that same is in violation of administrative instructions dated 28.09.2021 and 30.09.2021, Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that qua their grievance, petitioners also submitted a representation dated 28.10.2021 (Annexure P-6). However, the same has not been adverted by the respondents till date. Hence, the instant petition.

¶14

Learned State counsel, on advance service appears and submits

¶15

that competent authority shall take appropriate decision on the pending representation dated 28.10.2021 (Annexure P-6).

¶16

SHALINI BHATIA 2021.11.29 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶17

Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek return by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.

¶18

Without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority i.e. respondent No.2- Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Panchkula to look into the grievance of the petitioners as per representation dated 28.10.2021 (Annexure P-6) and also by keeping in view the contentions raised in the present petition by treating the same as supplementary representation and take a decision, by giving specific reasons as to the compliance of Instructions dated 30.09.2021 (Annexure P-2). In case, it transpires that any recruitments have been made in violation of the aforesaid Instructions, then it be also stated in the order to be passed as to what action has been taken qua the erring official, found responsible for such violation.

¶19

Let the needful be done within a period of 60 days from today.

¶20

Disposed of accordingly.

¶21

November 26, 2021		(ARUN MONGA)
vandana		JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned:	Yes/No
Whether reportable:	Yes/No

¶22

SHALINI BHATIA 2021.11.29 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Anoop Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anoop Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhash Vs State of Haryana and Others

Iffco Tokiao General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Satwanti Devi and Others

Pooja Vs State of Haryana and Another

Jharmal Singh Vs State of Haryana

Abhey Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Mohan Lal Vs State of Haryana and Another