Petitioner sought mandamus for transfer back under the 180-day government policy. Single-judge court held transfer is administrative, noted no extreme hardship, and dismissed petition with liberty to follow up.
Petition dismissed with liberty to follow up with the competent authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-24022-2021 Date of Decision: 26.11.2021
Mohan Lal
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : Mr. Subhash Ahuja, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional A.G., Haryana.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Petition herein, inter alia , is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to implement the online transfer policy dated 09.10.2020 (Annexure P-2) notified by Haryana Government.
SHALINI BHATIA 2021.11.29 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
November 26, 2021 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2021.11.29 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court should interfere in an administrative transfer order that exceeds the 180-day period under the online transfer policy.
Whether extreme hardship exists to warrant judicial intervention in a government servant's transfer.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohan Lal
State of Haryana
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
