Lakhwinder Kaur v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge disposed CWP where State counsel stated petitioner's name remains on the BPL register for ration benefits; no further interference ordered.
Single judge disposed CWP where State counsel stated petitioner's name remains on the BPL register for ration benefits; no further interference ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
101
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-2298-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.02.2021
Lakhwinder Kaur, Sarpanch
...Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : Mr. L.S.Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Anju Sharma Kaushik, DAG, Punjab. (Presence marked through video conference)
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Grievance of the petitioner herein is that names of some village inhabitants (people below poverty line) have been struck off from the register/record maintained for the purposes of issuing blue ration card denying them benefits of cheap ration. Ration is given by the State to the card holders living below poverty lineat subsidised rates.
SHALINI BHATIA 2021.02.09 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
benefit of having the blue ration cards. It is however, made clear that in case of those not found entitled, appropriate reasons be recorded thereof by the competent authority by disposing of pending representation dated 17.09.2020 (Annexure P-1).
4. Disposed of accordingly.
February 09, 2021 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2021.02.09 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Lakhwinder Kaur
State of Punjab
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court