The High Court at Chandigarh declared the present writ petition infructuous because the petitioner's claim for category change was accepted during pendency, rendering the specific prayer unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
222
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP NO. 18292 OF 2021
DATE OF DECISION : 21.12.2021
Manika Rani …Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and another …Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN NONGA
Present : Mr. Brijender Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rohit Arya, DAG, Haryana.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel, on instructionsfrom Mr. Ramnish
Singla, ADA, submits that during the pendency of proceedings before this Court, claim of the petitioner has been accepted. She has been allowed to change her category, as has been prayed in the petition. In view thereof, instant petition is disposed of, having been rendered infructuous.
DECEMBER 21, 2021 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
VANDANA 2021.12.23 13:26 I attest to the accuracy of this order.
Manika Rani
State of Haryana
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
