The High Court held the writ petition not maintainable as the petitioners had already challenged the impugned order in another pending petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 204 (last case)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-14558-2021 Date of decision: 20.12.2021 Sunil Kumar and others …Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rohit Arya, DAG, Haryana. ***
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel submits that since the petitioners have also availed their remedy by challenging the impugned order dated 29.09.2021 vide another CWP No.21777-2021, the present writ petition is not maintainable.
In view of the uncontroverted statement made by learned State counsel, the present writ petition stands disposed of as not maintainable.
20.12.2021 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
VANDANA 2021.12.21 21:49 I attest to the accuracy of this order
Sunil Kumar and others
State of Haryana and others
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
