Appeal against an order dismissing a petition. The matter was heard via video conferencing. The petitioners filed a written reply stating they reside together happily and face no further threat. On this basis, the petition was held infructuous and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No. 898 of 2020 DATE OF DECISION :- July 02, 2021
Vijay Kumar and another ...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present :- Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Ghuman, DAG, Punjab.
The case has been taken up through Video Conferencing.
Written reply filed in terms of which the petitioners had got their statements recorded that they are residing together happily and they have no longer any threat from the private respondents.
It being so, the present petition has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE
July 02, 2021 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
PARVINDER SINGH 2021.07.02 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Vijay Kumar and another
State of Punjab and others
H.S. MADAAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
