The petitioner requested withdrawal of the writ petition as the matter was compromised between parties, eliminating apprehension of danger. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the present petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No. 852 of 2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 1.7.2021
Manoj Kumar and another
................Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab and others
.................Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan
Present: Mr. M.S. Saini, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Ghuman, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral)
Case taken up through video conferencing.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that since the matter has been compromised between the petitioners and private respondents,as such the petitioners do not apprehend any danger to their lives and liberty at the hands of private respondents, at this stage, therefore, they have instructed him to withdraw the present petition and he be permitted to do so. Allowed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( H.S. Madaan ) 1.7.2021 Judge chugh
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No
Whether reportable Yes / No
BANITA CHUGH 2021.07.31 14:37 I agree to specified portions of this document
Manoj Kumar and another
State of Punjab and others
H. S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
