Petitioners approached High Court via CRWP regarding anticipatory bail threat apprehension. State counsels reported police recorded statements; petitioners claimed no threatening apprehension. Court dismissed petition without representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No. 1616 of 2020 DATE OF DECISION :- July 15, 2021
Shivani Sharma and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present :- None for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Ghuman, DAG, Punjab.
The case has been taken up through Video Conferencing.
Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Charanjit Kaur states that the local police has recorded statement of petitioner No. 1 Shivani Sharma and her father Balak Ram and Shivani Sharma has stated that she does not have any apprehension of threat to her life and liberty at the hands of the private respondents.
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners in the
Court today. The petition stands dismissed accordingly.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE
July 15, 2021 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
PARVINDER SINGH 2021.07.15 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Shivani Sharma
another
State of Punjab
others
H.S. MADAAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
