The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a preferred writ petition as withdrawn, noting the petitioner's submission that she had undergone the sentence and did not intend to press the matter further.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRR-5049-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 15.11.2021
Shilpa Aggarwal
… Petitioner
Versus
Sarabjit Singh
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Ms. Kamlesh, Advocate for Mr. Pardeep Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Pal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Today, at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already undergone the sentence as imposed by the trial Court and affirmed by the learned lower Appellate Court and that the petitioner does not intend to press upon the instant petition and that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
| 15.11.2021 mohan |
(GURVIN | DER SINGH GILL) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
MOHAN SINGH 2021.11.15 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Shilpa Aggarwal
Sarabjit Singh
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
