Petitioner sought leave to withdraw criminal petition. Court dismissed petition on withdrawal with liberty to file afresh and directed trial court to summon prosecution witnesses.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. Trial Court directed to summon PWs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-471-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:-12.11.2021
Malkiat Singh @ Vicky
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Yashpal Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harbir Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
Today, at the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
The Trial Court is, however, directed to make efforts to ensure that the PWs are summoned and are present on the dates as may be fixed by the Trial Court for recording prosecution evidence. Short dates be fixed for the same.
12.11.2021 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.11.12 15:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Malkiat Singh @ Vicky
State of Punjab
GURVINDER SINGH GILL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
