The petitioner moved to withdraw the petition on the ground that charges had not been framed. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-9298-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:-4.3.2021
Palwinder Kaur … Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Daljeet Singh Virk, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Kumar, DAG, Punjab.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
Today, at the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition at this stage since charges are yet to be framed.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
4.3.2021 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.03.04 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Palwinder Kaur
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
