Petitioner requested withdrawal of the petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without expressing any opinion on merits or providing any reasoning or reference to legal provisions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-8713-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:-18.11.2021
Kala … Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. G.C. Shahpuri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana, assisted by ASI Pawan Kumar.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
Today, at the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
18.11.2021 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.11.18 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Kala
State of Haryana
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
