Allowed

Jobanpreet Singh @ Harjoban Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC17 Nov 2021CRM-M/3587/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted absoltue anticipatory bail to the petitioners, converting previous interim directions to absolute, subject to conditions including joining investigation and abiding by Cr.P.C. Section 438(2).

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to both petitioners; interim directions made absolute; made them join investigation and abide by Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

Jobanpreet Singh @ Harjoban Singh and Anr. Vs… — Anticipatory Bail | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh

¶2

CRM-M-3587-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 17.11.2021

¶3

Jobanpreet Singh @ Harjoban Singh & another

.... Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab

... Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL

¶9

Present:Mr.Ajay Pal Singh Rehan, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶10

Mr. Harbir Sandhu, AAG, Punjab, assisted by ASI Harjit Singh.

¶11

¶12

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)

¶13

The petitioners have approached this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in respect of a case registered against them vide FIR No. 01, dated 1.1.2021, Police Station Sadar Gurdaspur, District Gurdaspur, under Sections 452, 323, 148 and 149 IPC (Sections 324, 325 and 326 IPC added later on).

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the FIR came to be lodged under some misunderstanding which has now been resolved and the parties have compromised the matter. It has further been submitted that in fact a petition for quashing of the FIR on the basis of compromise has already been filed in this Court and pursuant

¶15

MOHAN SINGH 2021.11.17 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶16

- 2 - CRM-M-3587-2021 (O&M)

¶17

to interim directions issued by this Court, the statements of the parties had already been recorded before the Illaqa Magistrate.

¶18

Learned State counsel has informed that petitioner No.1-Jobanpreet Singh has joined investigation pursuant to interim directions issued by this Court. No interim directions for joining investigation had been issued qua petitioner No.2-Dilpreet Singh though his arrest had been stayed.

¶19

Keeping in view the aforesaid position wherein the matter is stated to have been resolved amongst the parties, the instant petition is accepted and the interim directions issued qua petitioner No.1Jobanpreet Singh @ Harjoban Singh, issued this Court vide order dated 27.1.2021 are hereby made absolute. It is further ordered that in the event of arrest, petitioner No.2-Dilpreet Singh be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The aforesaid bail granted to the petitioners are subject to the condition that the petitioners shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

¶20

The petition stands allowed accordingly.

¶21

17.11.2021 (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) Mohan JUDGE

¶22

Whether speaking /reasoned	Yes / No
Whether Reportable	Yes / No

¶23

MOHAN SINGH 2021.11.17 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Jobanpreet Singh @ Harjoban Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jobanpreet Singh @ Harjoban Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Rinku Verma Vs State of Haryana

Pinku Verma Vs State of Haryana

Rajender Singh and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Akshay Alias Bholu Vs State of Haryana

Amrik Singh Vs State of Haryana and Another