Lakhan v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
The court directed the reader to detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of the same date (Pardeep Versus State of Haryana) for the current order, containing no independent reasoning or decision.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-5041-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:-16.3.2021
Lakhan … Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana, assisted by SI Rajbir Singh.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in CRM-M-34975-2020 titled as Pardeep Versus State of Haryana.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lakhan
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
Gurvinder Singh Gill
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/5041/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court