Bhola Ram Alias Sukhwinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was disposed of as infructuous because the petitioner was already arrested at the time of the hearing.
The petition was disposed of as infructuous because the petitioner was already arrested at the time of the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-24-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:-15.3.2021
Bhola Ram @ Sukhwinder Singh … Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Pardeep Kumar Kapila, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Pal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab.
Ms. Rana Ghuman, Advocate for the complainant. (proceedings conducted through video conferencing) *****
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
Today, at the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner stands arrested.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is disposed off having been rendered infructuous.
15.3.2021 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.03.15 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Bhola Ram @ Sukhwinder Singh
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court