(O&M) {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &…
petition withdrawn with liberty to file fresh bail application before trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-44893 of 2019 (O&M)
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-44893 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision:22.07.2021
Mohinder Bansal
... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Present:Mr. Vivek Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Robin Singh Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Singh Deol, DAG, Punjab
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)
The Court has been convened through video conferencing due to Covid-19 pandemic.
The petitioner is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.117 dated 20.07.2018 registered under Sections 420 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Navi Baradari, Jalandhar.
On the basis of prayer made in the application (CRM No.21332 of 2021), counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh bail application before the trial Court.
SAVITA KADIAN 2021.07.22 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
CRM-M-44893 of 2019 (O&M)
{2}
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
| (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|
| July 22, 2021 savita |
|
| Whether Speaking/Reasoned | Yes/No |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
SAVITA KADIAN 2021.07.22 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Mohinder Bansal
State of Punjab
Suvir Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
