Petitioner sought regular bail in a NICRA case. Counsel moved the court for permission to withdraw the petition, requesting no objection to withdraw. Permission granted.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-230 of 2020 Date of decision:22.07.2021
Bali Ram @ Harman
... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Present:Mr. J.S.Bhinder, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Singh Deol, DAG, Punjab.
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)
The Court has been convened through video conferencing due to Covid-19 pandemic.
The petitioner is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.171 dated 04.09.2019 registered under Sections 22 and 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 at Police Station Dirba, District Sangrur.
Having argued for sometime and realizing that the Court is not inclined to agree with his submissions, counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE
July 22, 2021 savita
| Whether Speaking/Reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
SAVITA KADIAN 2021.07.22 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bali Ram @ Harman
State of Punjab
Suvir Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
