The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, which the Court granted, resulting in the dismissal of the matter as withdrawn.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-3449-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:-9.4.2021
Shivam Kapoor … Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Ms. Monika Jangra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Vaddepati, Advocate for the complainant. (proceedings conducted through video conferencing) *****
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
Today, at the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
9.4.2021 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.04.09 20:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Shivam Kapoor
State of Haryana
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
