The court disposed of the matter by referring to detailed reasons passed in a separate order (Neelam Sahni vs. State of Haryana) dated the same day, without recording fresh reasoning in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-2137-2021(O&M) Date of Decision:-8.4.2021
Karan Prabhakar
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Robert Kanwar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Sheenu Sura, DAG, Haryana, assisted by SI Taro.
(proceedings conducted through video conferencing)
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of
even date passed in CRM-M-44141-2020 titled as Neelam Sahni Versus State of Haryana.
8.4.2021 (Gurvinder Singh Gill) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.04.08 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Neelam Sahni Versus State of HaryanaApplied¶14
Neelam Sahni Versus State of Haryana
Karan Prabhakar
State of Haryana
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
