Disposed

Rishi Kapoor v. State of Haryana and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC16 Dec 2021CRM-M/31975/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed applications for preponement of hearing and withdrawal of a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The main petition was dismissed after withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition if legally permissible, with no objection from respondents.

What did the court decide?

Main petition taken on Board; constituent applications allowed; main petition dismissed for withdrawal with liberty to file fresh petition if legally permissible.

Rishi Kapoor Vs State of Haryana and Another — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Sr.No.117

¶3

CRM Nos.42353 & 42358 of 2021 in CRM-M No.31975 of 2021 Date of Decision: 16.12.2021

¶4

Rishi Kapoor

¶5

...Applicant-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Haryana and another

¶8

...Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

¶10

Present: Mr. Deepam Raghav, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner.

¶11

¶12

MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J. (ORAL)

¶13

CRM No.42353 of 2021

¶14

This application has been moved on behalf of the applicantpetitioner for seeking the preponement of the date of hearing in the main petition bearing CRM-M No.31975 of 2021 from 14.01.2022 to some earlier date as he (applicant-petitioner) intends to withdraw the said main petition.

¶15

Notice in the application.

¶16

Mr. Apoorv Garg, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, who has appeared on behalf of respondent No.1 in this case in pursuance of the copy of the instant application having been sent to the respondent-State in advance and Ms. Kiran Bala Jain, Advocate, who has joined the proceedings, through virtual mode, on behalf of respondent No.2, accept the notice on behalf of these respondents and they submit that they have no objection in allowing this application.

¶17

NEETU RANI 2021.12.17 17:19 I attest to the accuracy of this order PHHC

¶18

CRM Nos.42353 and 42358 of 2021 in -2CRM-M No.31975 of 2021

¶19

.....

¶20

Accordingly, the present application is hereby allowed and the above-said main petition is taken on the Board today itself.

¶21

CRM No.42358 of 2021

¶22

This application has been moved on behalf of the applicantpetitioner for seeking permission to withdraw the above-said main petition with liberty to him to file a fresh petition for seeking the quashing of the FIR as registered against him under Section 174-A IPC subsequently.

¶23

Notice in the application.

¶24

Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 accept the notice and they submit that they have no objection for the same.

¶25

Keeping in view the above-said fact as well as the reasons as mentioned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the applicant-petitioner is permitted to withdraw the afore-mentioned main petition with the liberty afore-said, if otherwise legally permissible to him.

¶26

CRM-M No.31975 of 2021

¶27

Dismissed for having been withdrawn with the liberty afore-

¶28

said, if so permissible under the law.

¶29

		(MEENAK	SHI I. MEHTA)
16.12.2021			JUDGE
neetu
	Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes
	Whether Reportable	No

¶30

NEETU RANI 2021.12.17 17:19 I attest to the accuracy of this order PHHC

Rishi Kapoor v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rishi Kapoor v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Imran Vs State of Haryana and Others

Ravinder Singh Kadan @ Ravi and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Reema Sehgal and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Kamaldeep Kaur Gill and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Harpal Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Rishi Kapoor Vs State of Haryana and Another