Dismissed
Imran v. State of Haryana and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCRWP/11304/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.240
CRWP No.11304 of 2021 Date of Decision: 15.12.2021
Imran
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present: Mr. Chander Shekhar Singhal, Advocate, for the petitioner (joined through virtual mode).
Ms. Ambika Sood, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3.
MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J. (ORAL)
Reply on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 has been
submitted in the Court and the same is taken on the record.
However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition has become infructuous as the detenues have already been released.
Accordingly, the petition in hand stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
| (MEENAK | SHI I. MEHTA) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 15.12.2021 | JUDGE | ||
| neetu | |||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes | ||
| Whether Reportable | No |
NEETU RANI 2021.12.15 17:30 I attest to the accuracy of this order PHHC
Imran
The State of Haryana
Meenakshi I. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court