Disposed

Rishabh Josan v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC22 Jan 2021CRM-M/3161/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A PIL challenging a proclamation order under CrPC Order IX Rule 9. The High Court observed that cheque bounce is a bailable offence and disposed of the matter by recalling the petitioner from the status of a proclaimed person via undertaking, subject to fixation of bail, conditional appearance, and deposit of dividend for poor patients' welfare fund.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner recalled; empowered to appear by 27.01.2021 for bail on terms including 20,000 deposit and undertaking.

Rishabh Josan Vs State of Punjab and Others — Cheque Dishonour | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

CRM-M-3161 of 2021

¶2

#1#

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-3161 of 2021 Date of Decision: 22.01.2021

Rishabh Josan

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and Ors.

¶9

.....Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU Present: Mr. Karan Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner. HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J

¶11

The challenge herein is to the validity of the impugned order dated 09.12.2020 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned JMIC, Jalalabad (W) declaring the petitioner as proclaimed person.

¶12

Facts leading to the instant case are that a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed by respondent No.2 against the petitioner and respondent Nos.3 to 8. Respondent No.3 is stated to be a Partnership Firm, which is running a business of rice sheller. As per the averments made in the complaint, the paddy was purchased by the Firm-respondent No.3 and in order to discharge his liability towards the complainant, said respondent issued Cheque dated 27.03.2017 bearing the signatures of the petitioner.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is neither a partner nor associated with the affairs of the Firm. It is submitted that non-appearance of the petitioner was not intentional. The petitioner did not receive any summon in the said case and that it was only on 09.12.2020, when the counsel for the petitioner appeared before the

¶14

learned trial Court in some another case that it came to his knowledge of MANOJ KUMAR 2021.01.22 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶15

#2#

¶16

CRM-M-3161 of 2021

¶17

petitioner having been declared as proclaimed person. He undertakes that the petitioner shall appear before the learned trial Court on any date to be fixed by this Court.

¶18

Notice of motion.

¶19

Mr. Sarabjit Singh, AAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the fact that the complaint is under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which is a bailable offence, this petition is disposed of with the observation that the petitioner may appear before the learned trial Court on or before 27.01.2021. On his doing so, he shall be enlarged on bail by the trial Court subject to his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to its satisfaction. He shall also file an undertaking before the concerned Court to continue appearing as and when required apart from following all the terms and conditions fixed in this respect.

¶21

This shall, however, subject to the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.20,000/- with the Director, PGI, Chandigarh P oor Patients' Welfare Fund.

¶22

January 22, 2021 (Harinder Singh Sidhu) manoj Judge Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶23

MANOJ KUMAR 2021.01.22 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Rishabh Josan v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rishabh Josan v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajinder Dhiman @ Nonu Vs State of Haryana

Raj Kumar @ Raju Vs Abhijeet Kaplish

Balbir Singh Vs State of Punjab

Subhash Chander Vs Mahavir Singh and Ors.

Makhan Singh Vs Sukhchain Singh Gill

Kusum Rani Vs State of Haryana and Another