Disposed

Rajinder Dhiman @ Nonu v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Jan 2021CRM-M/2722/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, admitted to bail but whose bonds were cancelled due to non-appearance (claimed COVID related misinformation), filed a petition to be enlarged on bail contingent upon ensuring presence at trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to appear on 25.01.2021; enlarged bail to be granted by trial court conditional on appearance and deposit of Rs. 5000/- with PGIMER.

Rajinder Dhiman @ Nonu Vs State of Haryana — Quashing and FIR | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

#1#

¶2

CRM-M-2722 of 2021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-2722 of 2021 Date of Decision: 21.01.2021

¶5

Rajinder Dhiman @ Nonu

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

.....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU Present: Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J

¶11

Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.554 dated 04.06.2020 under Section 379-A IPC registered at P.S Jagadhri City, District Yamuna Nagar.

¶12

Allegations against the petitioner are that he along with his coaccused had snatched the bag containing one mobile phone mark Vivo along with Jio Sim card and certain necessary documents besides Rs.1500/from the complainant.

¶13

The petitioner was admitted to bail by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Jagadhri on 18.09.2020. However, due to absence of the petitioner on one of the dates i.e 15.12.2020 as fixed by the learned trial Court, bail bonds and surety bonds of the petitioner were cancelled and his presence has been ordered to be secured through non-bailable warrants.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that his nonappearance was not intentional. In fact, the petitioner was present in the court complex on 15.12.2020 but because of being informed/assured by his counsel that due to COVID-19, all the cases have been adjourned and he

¶15

would be informed of the next date accordingly, he could not cause his MANOJ KUMAR 2021.01.21 18:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶16

#2#

¶17

CRM-M-2722 of 2021

¶18

appearance on the date fixed. He states that the next date fixed before the trial Court is 25.01.2021. He undertakes that the petitioner shall appear before the learned trial Court on the date fixed or any date to be fixed by this Court.

¶19

Notice of motion.

¶20

Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the facts of the present case, this petition is disposed of with the observation that the petitioner may appear before the learned trial Court on the date fixed i.e 25.01.2021. On his doing so, he shall be enlarged on bail by the trial Court subject to his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to its satisfaction. He shall also file an undertaking before the concerned Court to continue appearing as and when required apart from following all the terms and conditions fixed in this respect.

¶22

This shall, however, subject to the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.5000/- with the P oor Patients' Welfare Fund of the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh.

¶23

January 21, 2021 manoj

¶24

(Harinder Singh Sidhu) Judge

¶25

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶26

MANOJ KUMAR 2021.01.21 18:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Rajinder Dhiman @ Nonu v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajinder Dhiman @ Nonu v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ujagar Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab

Baljeet Singh @ Baljit Vs State of Punjab

Rajkumar and Ors. Vs S.N. Rai, Commissioner and Secretary, Haryana and Ors.

Raj Kumar @ Raju Vs Abhijeet Kaplish

Balbir Singh Vs State of Punjab

Ramdhari and Ors. Vs Balwan Singh and Others