Single judge allowed the preponing of the main case to be heard immediately by the Hon'ble Court, but in the context of the side application, dismissed the petitioner's request to examine a public clerk witness regarding a registered sale deed.
Request to examine the clerk witness is dismissed; main case taken up for hearing today.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
102
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM-9868-9869-CII-2021 in/and CR-591-2021 Date of decision: 05.10.2021
Krishan Kumar Bhatia …Petitioner Versus Satpal and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
CM-9868-CII-2021
This is an application for preponing the main case, which is pending for 06.01.2022.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, as prayed for and the main case is taken up on Board for hearing today itself. Main case
Grievance of the petitioner herein is against an order dated 28.01.2020 whereby learned Trial Court has closed the evidence of the petitioner by declining his request to grant him one more opportunity to examine PW Kuldeep Singh, a clerk in the office of Sub Registrar, Ludhiana.
is now slated for hearing on 14.10.2021.
SHALINI BHATIA 2021.10.12 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
another Vs. Muthalur Bojjappa reported in 1963 AIR 1633 .”
05.10.2021 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2021.10.12 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there was any cause to interfere with the Trial Court's order closing the petitioner's evidence without examining a specific clerk witness.
Whether the authenticity of a registered sale deed requires proof by examination of the registering office clerk under Section 77 of the Indian Evidence Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mehar Singh and others Vs. Jagmal Singh @ Jaipal Singh and othersRelied on¶19
RSA No. 733 of 1987
Madamanchi Ramappa and another Vs. Muthalur BojjappaRelied on¶19
1963 AIR 1633 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Krishan Kumar Bhatia
Satpal and others
ARUN MONGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
