Disposed

Rajneesh Behl and Others v. State of Haryana and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC4 Oct 2021CWP/20136/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a certiorari petition concerning seniority disputes for Deputy Superintendents, this High Court disposed of the matter without commenting on merits. It directed the competent authority to expedite a decision on the petitioners seniority grievance, treating their pending representation as supplementary, with a timeline of six months.

What did the court decide?

The petition was disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the pending representation within six months, treating writ contentions as supplementary representations.

Rajneesh Behl and Others Vs State of Haryana… — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

128

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CWP-20136-2021 Date of decision: 04.10.2021

¶4

Rajneesh Behl and others ...Petitioners

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Goyat, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶7

Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana. (Presence marked through video conference).

¶8

¶9

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)

¶10

Petitioners herein, inter alia, seek issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned seniority list dated 02.02.2021 (Annexure P-1) in the cadre of Deputy Superintendents, as determined by respondent No.2. Petitioners plead that process of promotion on the post of Circle Superintendent has been started by ignoring them, despite their being senior. They claim seniority on the basis of their length of service as they joined the department comparatively much earlier to others, who are mentioned in the impugned seniority list.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that qua their aforesaid grievance, petitioners submitted a representation dated 28.08.2021 (Annexure P-7), the same has not been adverted by the respondents till date. Hence, the instant petition.

¶12

Notice of motion. On advance service, learned State counsel joins proceedings and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State of Haryana and seeks time to file reply.

¶13

VANDANA 2021.10.04 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶14

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that let a final decision be taken, by the competent authority on the pending representation dated 28.08.2021 (Annexure P-7).

¶15

Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek return by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.

¶16

Without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to look into the grievance of the petitioners as per representation dated 28.08.2021 (Annexure P7) and also by keeping in view the contentions raised in the present petition by treating the same as supplementary representation and take a decision, in accordance with law.

¶17

Let the needful be done as expeditiously as possible, but not later than 06 months from today.

¶18

Any promotion made in the meanwhile shall be subject to the final view taken by the administrative authority on the pending representation dated 28.08.2021 (Annexure P-7) of the petitioner.

¶19

Disposed of accordingly.

¶20

04.10.2021 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE

¶21

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶22

VANDANA 2021.10.04 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Rajneesh Behl and Others v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajneesh Behl and Others v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Rabiya Khatun and Ors.

Narender and Ors. Vs Ram Rati

The Estate Officer Huda, Sirsa, District Sirsa Vs Surender Kumar Garg

Ms. Kusum and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Shamsher Singh and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sudheer Vs State of Haryana and Others