This order dismissed the petition by reference to a separate judgment passed on the same date without stating substantive reasons. No legal proposition is established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.10132 of 2020 Date of Decision: September 16th , 2020
Gurwinder Kaur & others
..... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS State of Punjab & others
..... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANT PARKASH
PRESENT : - Ms. Neesh Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Ambika Bedi, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.
. . .
Sant Parkash, J
This petition stands dismissed vide separate judgment of even date passed in CWP No.8248 of 2020 titled ‘Karamjit Kaur & others vs. State of Punjab & others’.
(Sant Parkash) Judge September 16th , 2020 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned: Yes/ No Whether Reportable: Yes/ No
AVIN KUMAR 2020.09.16 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gurwinder Kaur & others
State of Punjab & others
Sant Parkash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
