Disposed

Nancy Sharma v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC1 Sept 2020CRM-M/25459/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed by a woman alleging domestic violence and failure of police. The High Court did not comment on merits but directed the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, to decide the petitioner's representation within one month.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana to decide the petitioner's representation within one month.

Nancy Sharma Vs State of Punjab and Others — Domestic Violence | Punjab & Haryana HC (2020)

¶1

CRM-M No. 25459 of 2020

¶2

...1...

¶3

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

¶4

CRM-M No. 25459 of 2020 Date of Decision: 01.9.2020

Nancy Sharma

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

¶9

......Respondent

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

¶11

Present: Mr. Amritpal Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

¶13

HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J. (ORAL)

¶14

Case is being taken up for hearing through video conferencing. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No. 2 and 3 to take action on the complaint (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner and further to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of private respondents.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with respondent No. 4-Munish Kumar on 14.10.2015 and out of the said wedlock, a son was born. He further submits that the petitioner is working as a Manager at Black Panda Home Service Provider Company, Feroze Gandhi Market at Ludhiana. Learned counsel also submits that on 19.8.2020, respondents No. 4 and 6 had given beatings to the petitioner and she saved her life by running from the matrimonial home. She herself got medically examined on 20.8.2020. It is further submitted that for redressal of her grievance, the petitioner has moved a representation dated 20.8.2020 (Annexure P-2) to Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana-respondent No. 2 but no action has been taken on the same so far.

¶16

GURPREET SINGH 2020.09.01 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh

¶17

CRM-M No. 25459 of 2020

¶18

...2...

¶19

Notice of motion to the State-respondents No. 1 to 3 only.

¶20

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Harbir Sandhu, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State.

¶21

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State counsel.

¶22

Without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to Commissioner of Police, Ludhianarespondent No. 2 to decide the representation (Annexure P-2), moved by the petitioner, within one month after receiving the copy of the order, in accordance with law.

¶23

(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE

¶24

September 01, 2020 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶25

GURPREET SINGH 2020.09.01 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh

Nancy Sharma v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nancy Sharma v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manpreet Singh @ Ruby @ Mani Vs State of Punjab

Resham Singh @ Reshu Vs State of Punjab

Sahil @Titu Vs State of Haryana

Sandeep Vs State of Haryana

Tahir Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Harpreet Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others