Disposed

Tahir v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC1 Sept 2020CRM-M/25391/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought directions under Section 482 CrPC for fair investigation into injuries sustained by himself and others on 19.4.2020, alleging offences under IPC and Arms Act. No action was taken on a complaint dated 25.6.2020, resulting in constant threats.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Superintendent of Police, Nuh to look into the complaint/representation (Annexure P-1) and decide the same within one month.

Tahir Vs State of Haryana and Ors. — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Punjab & Haryana HC (2020)

¶1

...1...

¶2

CRM-M No. 25391 of 2020

¶3

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

¶4

CRM-M No. 25391 of 2020 Date of Decision: 01.9.2020

Tahir

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

¶9

......Respondent

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

¶11

Present: Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

¶13

HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J. (ORAL)

¶14

Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

¶15

This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to the official respondents to conduct fair investigation and take action against the accused persons for committing offences under Sections 148/149/323/452/313/316/506/269/270/188 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.

¶16

Notice of motion.

¶17

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the State.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the occurrence in question took place on 19.4.2020, in which the petitioner along with three other persons received injuries. He further submits that in the said occurrence, Arshida wife of Arshad (injured), also received injuries and suffered a miscarriage. It is further submitted that regarding the said occurrence, a complaint/representation dated 25.6.2020 (Annexure P-1) was made GURPREET SINGH 2020.09.01 16:10 I attest to the accuracy andbut no action has been taken on the accused persons so far and the petitioner integrity of this document Chadigarh

¶19

CRM-M No. 25391 of 2020 ...2...

¶20

and his family members have been receiving constant threats from private respondents. He further states that he would be satisfied if the representation dated 25.6.2020 (Annexure P-1) is decided by respondent No. 4 within a stipulated period.

¶21

Keeping in view the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to Superintendent of Police, Nuh-respondent No. 4 to look into the complaint/representation (Annexure P-1), moved by Arshad and decide the same within one month after receiving the copy of the order, in accordance with law.

¶22

	(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE
September 01, 2020
Gurpreet
Whether speaking/reasoned	: Yes/No
Whether reportable	: Yes/No

¶23

GURPREET SINGH 2020.09.01 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh

Tahir v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tahir v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manpreet Singh @ Ruby @ Mani Vs State of Punjab

Resham Singh @ Reshu Vs State of Punjab

Sahil @Titu Vs State of Haryana

Sandeep Vs State of Haryana

Nancy Sharma Vs State of Punjab and Others

Harpreet Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others