Petitioner challenged the order of detention. The High Court held the petition infructuous as the petitioner had been granted regular bail by the trial court and dismissed the matter accordingly.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-232 of 2020 DATE OF DECISION :- February 24, 2020
Ravi Kumar @ sonu
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present :- Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Amarjit Kaur Khurana, DAG, Punjab.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the petitioner has been granted regular bail by the trial Court, therefore, this petition has become infructuous and it be disposed of accordingly.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE
February 24, 2020 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
PARVINDER SINGH 2020.02.25 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Ravi Kumar @ sonu
State of Punjab
H.S. MADAAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
