The High Court allowed a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court converted the interim bail order into an absolute order since the petitioner had joined the investigation as directed.
Petition allowed; interim bail order dated 14.05.2020 made absolute subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PANKAJ KUMAR IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 2020.07.10 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH integrity of this document
CRM-M No.12297 of 2020
Date of Decision.10.07.2020
Sanjeev Kumar
...Petitioner
Vs
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Mr. Inderjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.
-.-
JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL)
| (JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|
| July 10, 2020 | |
| Pankaj* | Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No |
| Whether reportable Yes/No |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be allowed after the petitioner joins the investigation.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjeev Kumar
State of Haryana
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
