Writable petition filed under Article 226 alleging detention of petitioner's mother. Court examined status report from police which denied apprehension of the mother. Case disposed of without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PANKAJ KUMAR -1- 2020.07.10 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP No.3575 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.3575 of 2020 Date of Decision.08.06.2020
Charanjit Singh
...Petitioner
Vs
State
...Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate Legal Aid counsel for the petitoner.
Ms. Bhavna Gupta, AAG, Punjab.
-.-
JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL)
On receipt of application/complaint received from Charanjit Singh son of Joginder Singh, resident of village Bhutti Wala, Police Station Makhu, Tehsil Zira, District Ferozepur with an allegation that his mother has been forcibly taken away by the police officials of Police Station Ghall Khurd, the same has been entertained as writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Notice of the said petition was issued to the State of Punjab and a reply was sought in the said matter.
Pursuant to the said notice, a status report has been filed by way of affidavit of Rajwant Kaur, Sub Inspector No.21/JPCT, SHO, Ghal Khurd, District Ferozepur stating that a complaint was received against brother of Charanjit Singh on the basis of which an FIR No.37 dated 11.05.2020 under Sections 307, 323, 506, 427, 454, 380, 148, 149 IPC and 25/27 of the Arms Act has been registered. It has further been stated in the status report that neither the mother of the petitioner is required by the police for interrogation in any cae nor she was ever apprehended by the police as alleged in the instant petition.
CRWP No.3575 of 2020
-2-
I have heard learned counsel for the State and have also perused the status report as filed. In view of the fact that mother of the petitioner was not apprehended by the police at any point of time as alleged in the instant petition, no further orders are called for in the instant petition.
Disposed of accordingly.
(JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE
July 08, 2020 Pankaj*
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the allegation that the petitioner's mother was forcibly taken away by the police forces the court to issue further orders in the habeas corpus petition.
Whether the police apprehended the petitioner's mother as alleged in the writ petition.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Charanjit Singh
State
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
