The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's repeated non-appearance and failure of counsel to present on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR 9207 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 03, 2020
Pitamber
... Petitioner
Vs.
Rambir and another
... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH
Present : None.
FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (Oral)
In spite of repeated calls, none has come present on behalf of the petitioner, which was the situation even on the last date of hearing as well and it being the second consecutive default, impels this Court to hold that neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the present matter.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
March 03, 2020 (FATEH DEEP SINGH)
amit rana JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
51
AMIT RANA 2020.03.06 15:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Pitamber
Rambir and another
FATEH DEEP SINGH
AMIT RANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
