After repeated non-appearance by the petitioners' counsel, this single judge held that the parties were not interested in pursuing the matter and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR 5027 of 2014 (O&M)
Date of Decision: March 02, 2020
Union of India and another
.. Petitioner
Vs.
M/s Sanjeev Rai Mehta and another
... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH
Present : None.
FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (Oral)
In spite of repeated calls, none has come present on behalf of the petitioners, which was the situation even on the last date of hearing as well and it being the third consecutive default, impels this Court to hold that neither the petitioners nor their counsel is interested in pursuing the present matter.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
March 02, 2020 (FATEH DEEP SINGH)
amit rana JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
27
AMIT RANA 2020.03.03 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Union of India and another
M/s Sanjeev Rai Mehta and another
Fateh Deep Singh
Amit Rana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
