Single judge order dismissing a High Court application for non-prosecution as the applicant was not present and lacked interest in further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
T.A. No. 6966 of 2018 DATE OF DECISION :- July 25, 2019
Neelam Rani ...Applicant
Versus
Rajesh Kumar
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present :- None for the applicant.
None for the respondent. ***
There is no representation on behalf of the applicant. Similar was the position on the last date of hearing. It seems that applicant is not interested in further prosecution of the application, therefore, the same stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE July 25, 2019 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
PARVINDER SINGH 2019.07.26 14:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Neelam Rani
Rajesh Kumar
H.S. MADAAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
