The single judge allowed the dismissal of the writ petition (Non-Prosecution Application) by finding the appellant unable to contact the party. The matter was disposed of without the respondents being present.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-4577-1999 Date of Decision: 09.01.2019
Kuldip Singh
...Appellant
Versus
Laxmi and others
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present:Mr. Kewal Krishan, Advocate for Mr. Premjit Singh Kalia, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for the respondents.
JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (Oral
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is unable to contact the party and prays that the matter be dismissed for non-prosecution. Ordered accordingly.
09.01.2019 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned No. Whether reportable No.
SATYAWAN 2019.01.09 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Kuldip Singh
Laxmi and others
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
