Disposed

Satinder Katyal and Anr. v. Surender Sharma and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC9 Jan 2019CR/6825/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a revision petition not pressed on merits, confirming an eviction order subject to conditions including payment of arrears and vacated possession by September 30, 2019.

What did the court decide?

Revision disposed not pressed; eviction order confirmed; tenancy period extended till September 30, 2019, conditional on payment of rent and undertaking to vacate.

Satinder Katyal and Anr. Vs Surender Sharma and… — Landlord and Tenant | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

Civil Revision No.6825 of 2017

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

Civil Revision No.6825 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 09, 2019

¶5

Satinder Katyal and another

¶6

...... Petitioners

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

Surender Sharma (since deceased through LRs) and another

¶9

..... Respondents

¶10

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

¶11

Present: Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioners-tenants.

¶12

Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the respondents.

¶13

¶14

JAISHREE THAKUR, J.(Oral)

¶15

The petitioners-tenants herein seek to challenge the judgment dated 26.08.2014 passed by Rent Controller, Gurugram, whereby the eviction petition filed in respect of two shops owned by original petitioners therein was allowed, in appeal the Appellate Authority has partly allowed the appeal while setting aside the judgment of the Rent Controller qua shop No. 1 of performa respondent, however, qua shop No.2, the appeal has been dismissed while upholding the order of eviction.

¶16

Notice was issued on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioners that he has instructions that the petitioners-applicants would not press this petition on merits in case they are given adequate time to vacate

¶17

SATYAWAN 2019.01.09 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

Civil Revision No.6825 of 2017

¶19

-2-

¶20

the shop which has been under their tenancy for the last about 30 years.

¶21

On the last date of hearing, Mr Amit Jain Advocate, appeared on behalf of the respondents and sought time to get instructions.

¶22

Today, learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions from the petitioners prayed that that petitioners be allowed reasonable time for making arrangements of alternative accommodation as well as for vacating/ handing over the possession of the tenanted premises to the respondentslandlords.

¶23

Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, who is present in the court on behalf of the respondents on instructions from the respondents-landlords does not object in case, reasonable time is allowed to the petitioners-tenants to vacate the tenanted premises, subject to their depositing/clearing the entire arrears of rent upto date as well as regularly paying the future rent/ mesne profit as assessed by the Appellate Authority and furnishing an undertaking to the effect that they will hand over vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the the respondents-landlords.

¶24

In view of the above, this revision is disposed of being not pressed. Order of eviction dated 26.08.2014 passed by the Rent Controller, which was partly affirmed in appeal by the Appellate Authority is confirmed. However, the revision petitioners are allowed period upto 30^th September, 2019 to vacate the tenanted premises, subject to the following terms:-

¶25

(i) The petitioners-tenants will pay/deposit the entire due rent/ mesne profit upto January, 2019 within a period of two weeks.

¶26

SATYAWAN 2019.01.09 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶27

-3-

¶28

Civil Revision No.6825 of 2017

¶29

(ii) They will keep on paying/depositing the mesne profit as assessed by the Appellate Authority of subsequent months upto 30.09.2019 on or before 7^th day of each calendar month.

¶30

(iii) They shall file their joint affidavit before the Rent Controller within two weeks giving details of entire payment of rent and an undertaking to vacate and hand over vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondents-landlords on or before 30^th September, 2019

¶31

In case, the petitioners-tenants make default of any of the above-said terms, the respondents-landlords would be entitled to execute the order of eviction forthwith.

¶32

Disposed of accordingly.

¶33

09.01.2019 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes. Whether reportable No.

¶34

SATYAWAN 2019.01.09 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Satinder Katyal and Anr. v. Surender Sharma and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satinder Katyal and Anr. v. Surender Sharma and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohinder Singh Vs Gitto and Others

Rajesh Puri and Anr. Vs Paramjit Singh and Anr.

(O&M)State of Punjab Vs M\S Parmar Const. Co.

Kuldip Singh Vs Laxmi

Deepak Kumr Vs Simran Minor through His Father and Natural Guardian Krishan Lal@Krishan Kumar

Dinesh Kumar and Another Vs Amrish Kumar