Partly allowed

B.P Saxena & Ors. v. Vijay Kumar

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Jan 2019RSA/4057/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge called for the Ist Appellate Court to decide two undecided applications for amendment and additional evidence before deciding the underlying appeal, setting aside the previous judgment and decree and directing parties to appear for further proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Allowance of the appeal; setting aside the judgment and decree of the Ist Appellate Court; and remanding the matter to the Ist Appellate Court to decide the pending applications and dispose of the app

B.P Saxena & Ors. Vs Vijay Kumar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

RSA-4057-2014

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

RSA No. 4057 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 21, 2019.

¶5

B. P.Saxena and others

¶6

..........APPELLANTS.

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

Vijay Kumar

¶9

........RESPONDENT.

¶10

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶11

Present: Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate for the appellants.

¶12

Mr. K.K.Jain, Advocate for the respondent.

¶13

¶14

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶15

Heard.

¶16

It is not disputed that the appellants had moved applications before the Ist Appellate Court under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC seeking permission to lead additional evidence and for amendment of the written statement and both the applications remain undecided.

¶17

Learned Additional District Judge, Patiala in his comments has stated that these applications were not pressed during the arguments, as such, escaped his attention and no order could be passed.

¶18

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that report of the Ist Appellate Court may be called on these applications and on the basis of report, this appeal be decided.

¶19

Jyoti 2019.01.25 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

¶20

RSA-4057-2014

¶21

¶22

The submissions of learned counsel for the respondent cannot be accepted, for the reasons that in case the applications are allowed, the Ist Appellate Court has to proceed further to take amended written statement, replication, to frame fresh issues if required and to see as to whether parties are to be allowed opportunity to lead additional evidence. The respondent/plaintiff will have the right to challenge the order of Ist Appellate Court and in the event of application being declined, similar right will vest in appellant.

¶23

Keeping in view the above facts, this appeal is accepted and judgment and decree passed by the Ist Appellate Court is set aside. Parties are directed to appear before the Ist Appellate Court on 12.02.2019. The Ist Appellate Court/Successor Court, Patiala will take the appeal on Board, hear the parties to decide the applications and dispose of the appeal in accordance with law.

¶24

( SURINDER GUPTA )

¶25

January 21, 2019. JUDGE Jyoti-II

¶26

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶27

Jyoti 2019.01.25 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

B.P Saxena & Ors. v. Vijay Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.P Saxena & Ors. v. Vijay Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Kumar Singla Vs Mohinder Pal Singh

Kuldeep Singh Since Deceased Thr Lrs Vs Gurmeet Singh

Vinod Kumar and Anr. Vs Elizabeth and Anr.

Bharat Bhushan Sharma Vs Neetu Kalra

Shanti Devi and Others Vs Sunil Kumar and Others

Dharam Vir Bansal Vs Ashish Kumar & Anr.