Petitioner sought to withdraw Civil Revision No.167 of 2019 with liberty to file a fresh application before the Rent Controller. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the requested liberty.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application before Rent Controller.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Revision No.167 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 21, 2019.
Bharat Bhushan Sharma
......PETITIONER(s)
VERSUS
Neetu Kalra
.....RESPONDENT(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. J.S. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner intends to plead that respondent is not his landlord without challenging title deed in her favour. Seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh application before the Rent Controller seeking amendment of the written statement.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Fresh application, if any, filed by the petitioner will be decided on merits by learned Rent Controller.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) January 21, 2019. JUDGE Sachin M. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
SACHIN MEHTA 2019.01.21 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
Bharat Bhushan Sharma
Neetu Kalra
SURINDER GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
