Appeal by landowners allowed by relying on an even-dated judgment in RFA No.3996 of 2013. No substantive facts, reasoning, or specific relief are detailed in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.426 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision:23.10.2019
Om Parkash and others ....Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Shailendra Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate and Mr. Sidharath Goyal, Advocate, Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, Mr. Kamal Mor, Advocate for the landowners.
Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Addl. AG, Haryana Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana.
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J.
The appeal filed by the landowners is allowed in terms of the
detailed judgment of even date passed in RFA No.3996 of 2013 titled as
“ Naresh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others ”.
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) 23.10.2019 JUDGE Parveen Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2019.11.04 11:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Naresh and others Vs. State of Haryana and othersRelied on¶11
Naresh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others
Om Parkash and others
State of Haryana and others
G.S. Sandhawalija
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
