Allowed
Vipin Yadav v. State of Haryana & Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCRFA/7898/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single judge permit opn allowing appeal without elaboration.
What the court decided
AI extract
Single judge permit opn allowing appeal without elaboration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.7898 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:23.10.2019
Vipin Yadav ....Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and another ....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Shailendra Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate and Mr. Sidharath Goyal, Advocate, Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Ashok Tyagi, Advocate, Mr. R.A. Yadav, Advocate, Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Vijay Singh Kajla, Advocate, for the landowners.
Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Addl. AG, Haryana Ms. Vibha Tiwari, AAG, Haryana. *****
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J.
The appeal filed by the landowners is allowed in terms of the
detailed judgment of even date passed in RFA No.7824 of 2013 titled as
“ Vivek Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and others ”.
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) 23.10.2019 JUDGE Parveen Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2019.11.04 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vivek Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and othersFollowed¶10
RFA No.7824 of 2013
Vipin Yadav
State of Haryana
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court