Brief order dismissing the appeal and allowing cross-objections in land acquisition compensation matter, denying interest to landowners for delay period.
Appeal dismissed; cross-objections allowed; landowners denied interest on enhanced compensation for 924 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
XOBJR-101-CI-2017 (O&M) in/and RFA No.10739 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision:01.11.2019
Haryana State and another
....Appellant(s)
Versus
Smt. Premwati
....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Addl. AG, Haryana Ms. Vibha Tiwari, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. J.P. Ahlawat, Advocate, Mr. N.D. Achint, Advocate, Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, Mr. Varun Baanth, Advocate, Mr. R. Kartikeya, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate for the landowners/cross-objectors. *****
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J.
The appeal filed by the State is dismissed and cross-objection filed by the landowners is allowed in terms of the detailed judgment of even date passed in RFA No.4775 of 2014 titled as “ Tek Ram and another Vs. State of Haryana and another ”.
However, in view of earlier order dated 23.04.2018, the landowner(s) shall not be entitled to interest on the enhanced compensation for the period of delay of 924 days.
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) 01.11.2019 JUDGE Parveen Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2019.11.05 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc
Haryana State and another
Smt. Premwati
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
