The Single Judge allowed the appeal filed by landowners, relying on a detailed judgment passed on the very same date in a titled case (Tek Ram and another vs State of Haryana and another) to decide the matter before it.
The appeal filed by the landowners is allowed in terms of the detailed judgment passed in RFA No.4775 of 2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.9291 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision:01.11.2019
Smt. Vijay Lamxi Gur through her General Power of Attorney Sh. Tejender Singh
....Appellant(s)
Versus
Haryana State and others ....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. J.P. Ahlawat, Advocate, Mr. N.D. Achint, Advocate, Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, Mr. Varun Baanth, Advocate, Mr. R. Kartikeya, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate for the landowners.
Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Addl. AG, Haryana Ms. Vibha Tiwari, AAG, Haryana.
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J.
The appeal filed by the landowners is allowed in terms of the detailed judgment of even date passed in RFA No.4775 of 2014 titled as “ Tek
Ram and another Vs. State of Haryana and another ”.
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) 01.11.2019 JUDGE Parveen Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2019.11.05 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc
Smt. Vijay Lamxi Gur
Haryana State
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
