The single judge dismissed a review petition, holding that the arguments amounted to re-agitating issues already decided, which is outside the scope of review under Section 114 and Order 47 of the CPC. An error must be apparent on the face of the record.
Review petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.09.24 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
326
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RA-RS No.53 of 2019 (O&M) in RSA-1159-1993 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.09.2019
Maninder Singh and others
... Appellants
Versus
Dhanvir Singh and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Ravish Bansal, Advocate for the review applicants/appellants.
AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)
The arguments raised by the counsel for the review applicantappellants tantamount to re-agitating the issue, which is not the scope of the review as the ingredients of Section 114 and Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure do not envisage such grounds. There has to be an error apparent on the face of record, which has not been brought to the notice of this Court, much less, it tantamounts to re-agitate the points which have been raised and addressed, in view of the ratio decidendi culled out by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Tamilnadu Terminated Full Time Temporary LIC Employees Association Vs. S.K. Roy, The Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation of India and another” 2016 (9) SCC 366 .
The review petition is dismissed.
( AMIT RAWAL ) 23.09.2019 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
2 issues framed by the court
Whether arguments re-agitating issues already addressed fall within the scope of a review petition under Section 114 and Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Whether there is an error apparent on the face of the record justifying the filing of a review petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Tamilnadu Terminated Full Time Temporary LIC Employees Association Vs. S.K. RoyReferred¶14
Tamilnadu Terminated Full Time Temporary LIC Employees Association Vs. S.K. Roy, The Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation of India and another” 2016 (9) SCC 366
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Maninder Singh and others
Dhanvir Singh and others
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
