Petitioner sought quashing of termination order and restoration to service. Court dismissed the writ petition by referring it to a previously decided identical matter (CWP No.8953 of 2019) heard on the same day, finding no need for further justice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.9121 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.23.09.2019
Parveen Kumar
...Petitioner
Vs
State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
Present: Mr. Rajnish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Shruti Jain Goyal, DAG, Haryana.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)
Prayer in the writ petition is for quashing of order dated 25.03.2019 (Annexure P-14/T) whereby services of the petitioner as Carpenter from the office of respondent No.4 have been dispensed with. Further a prayer is made for issuance of direction to respondents to take back the petitioner into service.
Since this Court while dealing with identical matter in CWP No.8953 of 2019 titled as 'Parveen Vs. State of Haryana and others' decided on 17.09.2019 and other connected matters has dismissed the same, present writ petition is also dismissed in same terms.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 23, 2019 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned No Whether reportable No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2019.10.23 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Parveen Kumar
State of Haryana
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
