The Single Judge held that since the impugned advertisement was withdrawn and a cancellation notice produced before the Court, the writ petition had become infructuous and was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.8679 of 2019 Date of decision:25.09.2019
Vipin Kumar
... Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl.A.G.Haryana.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
Learned State Counsel has produced in Court a copy of cancellation notice dated 11.06.2019 vide which advertisement under challenge has been withdrawn. The same is taken on record.
In such circumstances, no cause of action survives in present writ petition and same is disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 25, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAVITA KADIAN 2019.09.27 09:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Vipin Kumar
Union of India
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
