Disposed

Prem Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Sept 2019CWP/16518/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought restoration to the post of Principal and employment as teacher after SDM was appointed Administrator and petitioner was sidelined. Court deemed no representation filed and directed petitioner to submit one to Management and District Education Officer within four days for a hearing within a week.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit representation to Management and DOE within four days to be heard and decided thereafter.

Prem Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2019)

¶1

CWP No.16518 of 2019

¶2

{1}

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP No.16518 of 2019 Date of decision:25.09.2019

Prem Kumar

... Petitioner

Vs.

State of Haryana and others

¶9

... Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶11

Present:Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press petition qua appointment of private respondent as Principal but submits that though during the tenure of Administrator, petitioner was given charge of Principal and Laxmi Narain Sharma, SDM was appointed as Administrator, vide order dated 03.03.2017 but after his expiry of tenure, SDM was again appointed as Administrator, vide order dated 06.07.2017 by the Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana Industries and Commerce Department which was stayed by this Court, vide order dated 26.07.2017 passed in CWP No.16322 of 2017, thus, in such circumstances, order dated 11.02.2019 appointing Laxmi Narain Sharma on the post of Principal requires to be revived but after that private respondent has been appointed as Principal and during pendency of writ petition, petitioner has not been allowed to work as Teacher and urges this Court for issuance of appropriate directions to the

¶14

SAVITA KADIAN 2019.09.27 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶15

CWP No.16518 of 2019

¶16

{2}

¶17

respondents.

¶18

Since the petitioner has not made any representation, I deem it appropriate to grant him an opportunity to submit the representation with regard to grievance expressed orally before this Court regarding not permitting him to mark presence and impart the education. In such circumstances, petitioner is directed to make a representation before the Management and District Education Officer within a period of four days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, who shall decide the same one week thereafter, after affording the opportunity of hearing to him in accordance with law.

¶19

Disposed of.
	(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
September 25, 2019 savita
Whether Speaking/Reasoned	Yes/No
Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶20

SAVITA KADIAN 2019.09.27 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Prem Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prem Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karan Singh and Others Vs State of Haryana Forest Department Thr Its Divisional Forest Officer

Dharampal and Others Vs State of Haryana Forest Department Thr Its Divisional Forest Officer

Satpal Vs State of Haryana Forest Department Thr Its Divisional Forest Officer

Neeraj Vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and Others

Vipin Kumar Vs Union of India and Others

Suman Devi Vs State of Haryana and Others